Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by works. God has declared that all men—not only Jews—may come to Him now for salvation. This is what Paul says in Romans , not that God has already determined exactly who will be saved.
For whom he foreknew, he also foreordained to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren: and whom he foreordained, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.
As Paul writes to encourage the brethren in Rome and Ephesus, he does establish that God has predestined them for conformity to the image of the Son and adoption. James , 1 Timothy Ephesians is used to demonstrate that we do not perform good works, but that God works through us. This is not explicitly stated; however, God is said to have established the good works to be performed, which He most certainly has in His Word.
Such does not mean that God performs the works. The actual performance of the work is left to us Titus ! We have been created to perform good works and have been given the parameters of good works according to Ephesians and that the Scriptures equip us for all these good works, 2 Timothy ; this does not require, however, that God also performs the works.
James also establishes that we are the ones who perform the work. Finally, 2 Timothy is a further explanation of the works done for our salvation, that Christ was crucified for our sins cf. John We affirm that we cannot work for salvation in the sense that by deeds alone we can be saved. We must have the grace of God, manifested in that sacrifice of His Son, in order to be saved; this is what Paul affirms in 2 Timothy In order to receive this sacrifice, however, it is abundantly evident that a response is necessary, and whatever response is given is necessarily a work cf.
We cannot earn our salvation, but we must be obedient if we wish to go to Heaven. Unconditional Election, therefore, has not been justified from the Scriptures. The problems with this doctrine are many; if God has predestined the elect for salvation by His sovereign choice alone, which necessitates that God has predestined the rest for condemnation in the same way.
This violates the Biblical precept found in Romans Some will say in response to this that Paul is only establishing that the sovereign choice of God is arbitrary: when God makes the choice, He does not take race, culture, ethnicity, birth, economic status, etc. The text does not require such a limitation on the interpretation, however, and such a limitation is not consistent with the message Paul provides immediately before making the statement in question, as can be seen in Romans But after thy hardness and impenitent heart treasurest up for thyself wrath in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God; who will render to every man according to his works: to them that by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honour and incorruption, eternal life: but unto them that are factious, and obey not the truth, but obey unrighteousness, shall be wrath and indignation, tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that worketh evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Greek; but glory and honour and peace to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
This is equally true of the Jew and the Greek. Furthermore, if God has already determined who will be saved and who will be condemned, this would even negate the need for the last Judgment, defined clearly in the following passages:. And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat upon it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne; and books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of the things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead that were in it; and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. And death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death, even the lake of fire.
And if any was not found written in the book of life, he was cast into the lake of fire, Revelation The Judgment is spoken of as a real event, wherein every man will be judged on the basis of his life and his relationship with Christ. Why would this event be written about if God had already determined its outcome? The main problem with unconditional election involves the Calvinist and Augustinian perspective on the nature of God Himself.
While there is much regarding the nature of God which we do not understand Isaiah , we can understand that which He has revealed to us. That nature is not the tyrannical God presented in Augustinian Calvinist theology; instead, God calls all men through the Gospel, and it is up to them to choose to serve Him or not, and reap the consequences Romans ; ; , 2 Thessalonians , 1 Timothy Therefore, it can be determined that unconditional election of each saint is not established in the Scriptures, for God now allows all men to come to Him.
John and Matthew are used to justify this belief:. Now they know that all things whatsoever Thou hast given Me are from Thee. Exactly who is under discussion is made evident in John Therefore, we can conclude that Jesus is not saying in John that God has given to Him only some, but that during His lifetime, the twelve plus the seventy given to Him have learned of Him. His prayer is clearly being given on behalf of all or any who will believe in Him and in His Father, as seen in John We have the witness of the Hebrew writer in Hebrews But Christ having come a high priest of the good things to come, through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of this creation, nor yet through the blood of goats and calves, but through his own blood, entered in once for all into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption.
How can these two statements agree? It is inaccurate to say that Christ died to cleanse the sins of a few or for many; Christ died to cleanse all men of sin. Christ did die for all men to be saved; however, since only a few will accept that sacrifice, it is effective only for those who do. The agent of the limitation is not God but man, for it is up to him to accept or reject the work of God through Jesus Christ.
The next tenet of TULIP is irresistible grace, the belief that God calls those whom He has elected with His grace and that the elect cannot help but to heed the call. This belief is justified with John , John , and Romans John is the discussion between Jesus and the Jews concerning spiritual matters.
He declares that the Father has drawn men, which He has, and that those will come to Him. How are men drawn? We see this in Romans God draws men to Him through the preaching of the Gospel and the acceptance thereof.
The statement in Romans is not making a declaration concerning how men are called; it is a simple statement of fact: if you are led by the Spirit, you are a son of God.
He has accepted you. This verse makes no comment concerning how the Spirit was bestowed upon you, whether God has forced Him upon you or if you received it by desire. The multiple conversion stories in the Acts of the Apostles point clearly to the desire of man to follow the Gospel call as seen in the day of Pentecost Acts , those who believed when the lame man was healed Acts , the Samaritans and the Ethiopian eunuch Acts , and many, many more.
God certainly calls, but as Paul explains in Romans , man may not answer; if one does answer the call, he has faith in Him:. But they did not all hearken to the glad tidings.
Furthermore, if God calls irresistibly by grace, why is it that Christians are called to go out and preach the Gospel Matthew ? It is true that some people were called more strongly or clearly than others.
We can think of Saul on the road to Damascus in Acts , or Matthew in Matthew both received personal and specific calls. Nevertheless, both still had to obey the call: Saul needed to be baptized Acts , and Matthew had to leave what he had to follow Jesus Matthew Had Saul not believed the vision, or had Matthew not left his post, would they have received salvation?
We have no reason to believe that they would! The final doctrine in the TULIP acrostic follows logically from the first four: if man cannot come to God, but God has determined to come to some through the death of His Son Jesus Christ and such individuals have no choice but to come to Him, it logically follows that those individuals must be saved and cannot be lost. This final idea is known as the perseverance of the saints.
Romans is often used to justify this:. And we know that to them that love God all things work together for good, even to them that are called according to his purpose. What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us? He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not also with him freely give us all things? Non-denominational churches often reflect the theological convictions of their founding pastor, some of whom are Calvinists.
Non-denominational churches tend to operate with a congregational form of church government. Because non-denominational churches are independent, they have no regional presbyter or missionary. Some non-denominational churches emphasize the teachings of Calvin. Some non-denominational pastors preach the five points of T. Others preach T. Other non-denominational churches stress that people are free to be Calvinist , Arminian , or something else and still be a member in good standing in the church.
Calvinism is often summarized with the acronym T. Reformed theology has other tenets, which Calvin influenced, along with other theologians like Augustine and Ulrich Zwingli These tenets include,. Calvin wrote a systematic theology and Bible commentaries. Calvin worked on his systematic theology text, The Institutes of the Christian Religion , for most of his life. Calvin also wrote commentaries on most books of the Bible.
But the thing itself is just the biblical gospel. References: [1] Source [2] Source [3[ Source. Calvin's writings impressed Guillaume Farel, the Reformer of Geneva, Switzerland so much that Farel pressed Calvin to come and help the Genevan reform. Geneva was to be Calvin's home until he died in Calvin did not live to see the foundation of his work grow into an international movement; but his death allowed his ideas to break out of their city of origin, to succeed far beyond their borders, and to establish their own distinct character.
Calvin believed that salvation is only possible through the grace of God. Even before creation, God chose some people to be saved. This is the bone most people choke on: predestination. Curiously, it isn't particularly a Calvinist idea. Augustine taught it centuries earlier, and Luther believed it, as did most of the other Reformers.
Yet Calvin stated it so forcefully that the teaching is forever identified with him. Calvin said it was clearly taught in the Bible. For Calvin, God was -- above all else -- sovereign. Like all the Reformers, he hated the way Catholicism had degenerated into a religion of salvation-by-works.
So Calvin's constantly repeated theme was this: You cannot manipulate God, nor put Him in your debt. If you are saved, it is His doing, not your own. He believed God alone knows who is elect saved and who isn't.
But, Calvin said, a moral life shows that a person is probably one of the elect. Calvin himself was intensely moral and energetic, and he impressed on others the need to work out their salvation - not to be saved but to show they are saved.
0コメント